Instead, we are treated to fine hypocritical spectacles, which now more than ever seem in ample supply: the critic of American materialism with a Southampton summer home; the publisher of radical books who takes his meals in three-star restaurants; the journalist advocating participatory democracy in all phases of life, whose own children are enrolled in private schools.
[Surprisingly, the converse of this rule also works],The same thing has been done with scientific journals for two hundred years That way, as I steal from it again and again going forward, you'll nod your head in recognition of the power of what he's writing about,Imagine, for example, getting the data and publishing a list of the top 50 firms, ranked by efficiency of space use
But deciding what you are you going to do with that duck is a far more important issue,Even more than that, it requires you to top what's out there, or you'll be ignored If there's justice, it will win the Pulitzer Prize,so part of selling a problem is hinting that there's a solution that others are using, or is right around the corner
We're surrounded by people who are busy getting their ducks in a row, waiting for just the right moment,Online video radically changes the reach and speed of the improvement cycle Email this ? Subscribe to this feed ? Share on Facebook,You won't wake up in the morning dreaming about how to solve it, or go to bed wondering how much it's costing you to ignore it
No clear-cut distinction can be drawn between professional and amateurs in science: exceptions can be found to any rule. Nevertheless, the word "amateur" does carry a connotation that person concerned is not fully integrated into the scientific community and, in particular, may not share its values.
